首页> 外文OA文献 >Influence of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: outcomes of the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Influence of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: outcomes of the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life randomized controlled trial

机译:价格折扣和技能培养策略对健康食品和饮料的购买和消费的影响:超市健康饮食生活随机对照试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Fiscal strategies are increasingly considered upstream nutrition promotion measures. However, few trials have investigated the effectiveness or cost effectiveness of pricing manipulations on diet in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects on fruit, vegetable, and beverage purchasing and consumption of a 20% price-reduction intervention, a tailored skills-based behavior-change intervention, and a combined intervention compared with a control condition. DESIGN: The Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life trial was a randomized controlled trial conducted over 3 mo [baseline (time 1) to postintervention (time 2) with a 6-mo follow-up (time 3)]. Female primary household shoppers in Melbourne, Australia, were randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price-reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price-reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Supermarket transaction data and surveys were used to measure the following study outcomes: fruit, vegetable, and beverage purchases and self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption at each time point. RESULTS: At 3 mo (time 2), price reduction-alone participants purchased more total vegetables and frozen vegetables than did controls. Price reduction-alone and price reduction-plus-skill-building participants purchased more fruit than did controls. Relative to controls, in the price-reduction group, total vegetable consumption increased by 233 g/wk (3.1 servings or 15% more than at baseline), and fruit purchases increased by 364 g/wk (2.4 servings; 35% more than at baseline). Increases were not maintained 6 mo postintervention (time 3). Price reduction-alone participants showed a tendency for a slight increase in fruit consumption at time 2 (P = 0.09) that was maintained at time 3 (P = 0.014). No intervention improved purchases of bottled water or low-calorie beverages. CONCLUSIONS: A 20% price reduction in fruit and vegetables resulted in increased purchasing per household of 35% for fruit and 15% for vegetables over the price-reduction period. These findings show that price modifications can directly increase produce purchases. The Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life trial was registered at Current Controlled Trials Registration as ISRCTN39432901.
机译:背景:财政战略越来越被认为是上游营养促进措施。但是,很少有试验研究在现实世界中对饮食定价操作的有效性或成本效益。目的:我们评估了降低价格20%的干预措施,基于技能的量身定制的行为改变干预措施以及联合干预措施与对照组相比对水果,蔬菜和饮料购买和消费的影响。设计:超市健康饮食终身试验是一项为期3个月的随机对照试验[基线(时间1)至干预后(时间2),随访6个月(时间3)]。澳大利亚墨尔本的女性主要家庭购物者被随机分配到1)技能建设(n = 160),2)降价(n = 161),3)技能建设和降价相结合(n = 160 )或4)对照组(n = 161)。超市交易数据和调查用于衡量以下研究结果:每个时间点的水果,蔬菜和饮料购买以及自我报告的水果和蔬菜消费。结果:在3个月(时间2),仅价格降低的参与者购买的总蔬菜和冷冻蔬菜比对照组多。单独进行降价和进行降价加技能建设的参与者购买的水果多于对照。相对于对照组,在降价组中,蔬菜总消费量增加了233 g / wk(3.1份,比基线增加了15%),水果购买量增加了364 g / wk(2.4份;比3月份增加了35%)。基准)。干预后6个月(时间3)未维持增加。仅价格降低的参与者显示出水果消费在时间2略有增加的趋势(P = 0.09),并在时间3保持不变(P = 0.014)。没有干预措施可以改善瓶装水或低热量饮料的购买。结论:在降价期间,水果和蔬菜价格降低20%,导致每户购买的水果增加了35%,蔬菜增加了15%。这些发现表明,价格调整可以直接增加农产品的购买量。超市生命健康饮食试验已在当前对照试验注册中注册为ISRCTN39432901。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号